Monday, September 30, 2019
Public Administration Essay
DEFINING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION When people think about government, they think of elected officials. The attentive public knows these officials who live in the spotlight but not the public administrators who make governing possible; it generally gives them little thought unless it is to criticize ââ¬Å"government bureaucrats.â⬠Yet we are in contact with public administration almost from the moment of birth, when registration requirements are met, and our earthly remains cannot be disposed of without final administrative certification. Our experiences with public administrators have become so extensive that our society may be labeled the ââ¬Å"administered societyâ⬠. Various institutions are involved in public administration. Much of the policy-making activities of public administration is done by large, specialized governmental agencies (micro-administration). Some of them are mostly involved with policy formulation, for example, the Parliament or Congress. But to implement their decisions public administration also requires numerous profit and nonprofit agencies, banks and hospitals, district and city governments (macro-administration). Thus, public administration may be defined as a complex political process involving the authoritative implementation of legitimated policy choices. Public administration is not as showy as other kinds of politics. Much of its work is quiet, small scale, and specialized. Part of the administrative process is even kept secret. The anonymity of much public administration raises fears that government policies are made by people who are not accountable to citizens. Many fear that these so-called faceless bureaucrats subvert the intensions of elected officials. Others see administrators as mere cogs in the machinery of government. But whether in the negative or positive sense, public administration is policy making. And whether close to the centers of power or at the street level in local agencies, public administrators are policy makers. They are the translators and tailors of government. If the elected officials are visible to the public, public administrators are the anonymous specialists. But without their knowledge, diligence, and creativity, government would be ineffective and inefficient. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Large-scale administrative organization has existed from early times. The ancient empires of Egypt, Persia, Greece, Rome, China, and later the Holy Roman Empire as well as recent colonial empires of Britain, Spain, Russia, Portugal, and France ââ¬â they all organized and maintained political rule over wide areas and large populations by the use of quite a sophisticated administrative apparatus and more or less skilled administrative functionaries. The personal nature of that rule was very great. Everything depended on the emperor. The emperor in turn had to rely on the personal loyalty of his subordinates, who maintained themselves by the personal support from their underlings, down to rank-and file personnel on the fringes of the empire. The emperor carried an enormous work load reading or listening to petitions, policy arguments, judicial claims, appeals for favors, and the like in an attempt to keep the vast imperial machine functioning. It was a system of favoritism and patronage. In a system based on personal preferment, a change of emperor disrupted the entire arrangements of government. Those who had been in favor might now be out of favor. Weak rulers followed strong rulers, foolish monarchs succeeded wise monarchs ââ¬â but all were dependent on the army, which supplied the continuity that enabled the empire to endure so long. In the absence of institutional, bureaucratic procedures, government moved from stability to near anarchy and back again. Modern administrative system is based on objective norms (such as laws, rules and regulations) rather than on favoritism It is a system of offices rather than officers. Loyalty is owed first of all to the state and the administrative organization. Members of the bureaucracy, or large, formal, complex organizations that appeared in the recent times, are chosen for their qualification rather than for their personal connections with powerful persons. When vacancies occur by death, resignation, or for other reasons, new qualified persons are selected according to clearly defined rules. Bureaucracy does not die when its members die. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION In the studies of the 1880s and later scholars have collected an impressive body of data how best to carry out and manage routine operations to gain productivity in industry. Principles of scientific business management were worked out and people were trained to follow them. Later successful business was seen as the model for the proper management of government, and the field of public administration was seen as a field of business, because management of all organizations in both the fields involves planning the activities and establishing goals; organizing work activities; staffing and training; directing or decision-making; coordinating to assure that the various work activities come together; report-à ing the status of work and problems to both supervisors and subordinates; and budgeting to assure that work activities correspond to fiscal planning, accounting, and control. Some scholars argued that administration is a more general term and a more generic process than management. Administration takes place at factories, schools, hospitals, prisons, insurance companies, or welfare agencies, whether these organizations were private or public. Accordingly they started speaking about business and public administration. There is an obvious difference between administration of business, or private organization, and administration of public organizations. Thus, the word public in ââ¬Ëpublic administrationââ¬â¢ is meaningful, and the study of public affairs will have to take into account not only management subjects common to both public and private sectors, but also the special environment in which the public servant has to live, an environment constituted of the mix of administration, policy making, and politics. And then, public organizations are more dependent on government allocations, more constrained by law, more exposed to political influences, and more difficult to evaluate than business organizations. These differences suggest caution in applying business management techniques to government agencies. Public Administration as an Academic Discipline Originally the discipline of public administration was not strong on theory. Early public administration was marked by a concern for applying theà principles of business management to a higher level of business ââ¬â public affairs. The method of case study was borrowed from business schools and applied to public administration. It was a prescriptive method and it told the student what he ââ¬Å"ought to doâ⬠and what he ââ¬Å"should not doâ⬠in specific situations of managing of public agencies. But by and by public administration developed a theory and a method of investigation of its own. In the 1950s it began to borrow heavily from sociology, political science, psychology, and social psychology that led to the formation of organization theory that helps to understand the nature of human organizations. Then, the 1950s and 1960s witnessed a dramatic upsurge of professional and academic participation in comparative administration studies. Comparative administration was focused on the developing nations and the analysis of ââ¬Å"transitional societiesâ⬠. Considerable attention was paid to studies of particular areas of the world. There were detailed case-by-case examinations of administrative situations in both the developing countries and the older, established bureaucracies of the industrialized world. They developed elaborate and highly generalized models of development administration and managed to explain many development situations. Another situation that has drawn from the management science traditions is the emergence of public policy analysis as a major branch of public administration studies. Writings on decision-making took into account economic, political, psychological, historical, and even nonrational, or irrational processes. The National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) advocates public policy analysis as one of the subject areas that should be included in any comprehensive program in administration. An interesting development in American public administration in the late 1960s is known as the New Public Administration which was a reaction against the value-free positivism that had characterized much of American public administration thought since World War II. It reasserted the importance of normative values, particularly social justice. The disclosures of the Watergate scandals have reinforced these positions and stressed anew the importance of integrity, openness, and accountability in the conduct of public affairs. This concern for the needs of human beings in the modern world can be seen in the growth of consumer and environmental protection functions domestically, and pressure for human rights around the world. The politicsà of public administration becomes increasingly interesting. Citizens, students, and scholars all round the world have come to understand the enormous impact of public administration on all of us, which is an important reason for the renaissance of their interest in public administration. SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS à OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Though there are different approaches to the field of public administration, this interdisciplinary subject nowadays has a quite strong theory that tries to take into account not only management subjects, but also the mix of administration, policy making, and politics. Let us consider some issues of this theory and start with organization theory common to both public and private sectors. The basic aspects of organization theory The terms public and private convey very different connotations to the general public. Public organizations are commonly pictured as large mazes that employ bureaucrats to create red tape; private organizations, on the other hand, are viewed to be run by hard-nosed managers who worry about profit and consumers. Public organizations are pictured as wasteful; private organizations are often presented as efficient. Yet these perceptions of their differences do not withstand careful scrutiny. Both types of organizations have much in common. Organization as bureaucracy Whether in business or government organizations, a dominant form of any administration is bureaucracy. Bureaucracies are generally defined as organizations that (1) are large, (2) hierarchical in structure with each employee accountable to the top executive through a chain of command, (3) provide each employee with a clearly defined role and area of responsibility, (4) base their decisions on impersonal rules, and (5) hire and promote employees taking into account their skills and training related to specific jobs. Bureaucracy has promise but it may also create problemsà and abuses of power, especially in the absence of effective coordination. Organization as a dynamic change Then, both public and private organizations have a dilemma ââ¬â the need for both stability and change. All organizations resist change as organizational change is often painful and destructive. Despite the need for new ideas, new approaches, and new types of employees, stability need usually dominates in organizations. And the forces of stability are stronger in public organizations. These institutions are generally insulated from survival concerns by legal mandates. Few of them declare bankruptcy despite serious doubts about their efficiency. Organization as human relations Both organizations, especially public organizations, are crowded with individuals. Individuals bring to organizations a complex mix of needs (both fundamental needs, as food, shelter, health care, and future security which are bought with money earned through work, and our highest spiritual needs to belong to a social group and to contribute to it, the need of self-actualization, esteem and recognition). To attract and keep people and to encourage dependable and innovative performance, organizations must take into account individual needs and motivation and satisfy them. Organizations should also make a system of various rewards that are powerful incentives for above-average performance. Pay, promotions, recognition, and others rewards are distributed by managerial staff. Social rewards like friendship, conversation, impact, satisfaction received from meaningful work appear in the process of work itself. The social rewards of some jobs are more obvious than others. Jobs with greater variety, responsibility, and challenge are inherently more rewarding while routine can generate lack of interest and boredom, and managers should take it into account. Organization as a structure of subgroups Most work in organizations depends on ensemble rather than solo effort, and is a mix of collaboration and interdependence. There are two basic groups in organizations: formal and informal. Formal groups (departments, committees) are identified and selected by organizational leaders, and their majorà characteristics are organizational legitimacy and task orientation. Informal groups (sport groups, common lunch hours, etc.) are not created by management but evolve out of the rich social environment. Though people in these groups get together to share common interests, not to work, their activities in them (supporting friends, trading rumors, and so on) have a profound effects on work and are as important as formal assignments. Organization as a cultural product Organizations have not only tangible dimensions such as an office building, an organizational chart, products and services, specific individuals and groups. Organizations are cultural and meaning systems as well as places for work. The concept of culture is difficult to define. But when comparing organizations in different countries, their cultural differences are extremely vivid and important. Despite similar work and procedures, police departments, for example, in India, Germany and Japan differ greatly. Offering a small gift to a policeman may be considered corruption in one nation and a sign of respect in another. Organizations are also meaning systems as they provide meaning to our lives. Feelings and emotions as well as purpose are very important to work life of an organization. The despair of the unemployed goes deeper than financial worries; many feel lost, without significance. Both culture and emotions influence structure, effectiveness, and change in organizations. Organizations are not only places of production; they are also sites rich with symbols and bureaucrats and executives act as tribal leaders: they tell stories, repeat myths, and stage rites and ceremonials. The symbolic and cultural dimensions of organizations are increasingly viewed as essential to understanding individual organizations and their role in society. The environment of public administration When many people think of public administration as an activity, they visualize large offices crammed with rows of faceless bureaucrats sitting at desks and producing an endless stream of paperwork. But this view captures only few of the important things that professional civil servants actually do. Public administration also has many more participants, such as theà executive, the legislature, the courts, and organized groups, which are involved in the formulation and implementation of public policy. And if a public administrator focuses the attention on only some of them then others may become neglected and that may lead to the jeopardy of the entire program. Summing up what has been said, it is important to underline that the theory of public administration is very diverse, is rapidly developing and depends much on what we know about why humans behave as they do when they interact with each other. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL:à ROLE-TYPES, ROLE CONFLICTS, ROLE OVERLOADS Large organizations employ many individuals. Charismatic leaders, caring supervisors, innovative program directors, and numerous street-level employees lend individuality to the collective and character to the whole organization. One should also remember that higher moral and ethical standards are expected of public employees than of private employees, and that public managers work within very strict limits of legislation, executive orders, and regulations surrounding government. But unique contributions of individuals do not obscure their general patterns of behavior, or roles. A role is a predictable set of expectations and behaviors associated with an office or position. Like an actor assigned a part, cabinet secretaries, police officers, and policy analysts step into roles that are already largely defined. A person usually performs several roles and it may become a source of stress and overload. Role overload is more than just too much work, or overwork. Role overload exists when the demands of various roles overwhelm an individualââ¬â¢s ability to balance expectations, when the demands of one role make it difficult to fulfill the demands of others. The lawyer who must cancel an appointment to care for a sick child or the professor who neglects his students to fulfill administrative obligations is experiencing a role conflict. Viewing organization as a system of roles helps to identify rights and obligations of each employee. Roles provide the consistency that holds an organization together. An organization that falls apart when individuals leave has not built an adequate structure of roles. Although public organizations containà many specific roles, five role-types ââ¬â the political executive, desktop administrator, professional, street-level bureaucrat, and policy entrepreneur ââ¬â are the most common. Political executives Political executives (the secretary of a State Department, the city manager, or the county administrator) occupy the top of public organizations. Although their jobs and responsibilities are different, they all perform the functions of a political aide, policy maker, and top administrator. In most cases, political executives are political appointees ââ¬â elected officials give them their jobs. That is why, their position, their tenure, and their influence while in office derive from the authority of elected officials. The official who wins the election most commonly appoints loyal supporters. They are advisors for selected officials. Elected officials cannot do everything. They can do little more than point the general direction and scrutinize the final result. That is why political executives appointed by them are also policy makers. The political executive initiates, shapes, promotes, and oversees policy changes. They may also have responsibility for major decisions. The ultimate authority, however, rests with the elected official. Political executives are also top-level administrators. It is a difficult role. Public executives are legally responsible for implementing policy They must cut through the red tape, resistance of change, intra-organizational conflict to assure that the public is served well.. Those political executives who fail to reach down and get the support and enthusiasm of their agency personnel will effect little change in policy. But if they completely disregard the preferences, knowledge, and experience of their agencies, stalemate ensues. If they uncritically adopt the views of their elected officials or their agencies, they may lose influence with elected officials. Desktop administrators Desktop administrators are career civil servants down the hierarchy a few steps from political executives. They are middle managers and closely fit the general description of a bureaucrat. Whether a social worker supervisor or the director of a major government program, the desktop administratorà spends days filled with memoranda and meetings. The desktop administrators are torn between the promises and practicality of governing. Desk administrators guide policy intentions into policy actions that actually change, for better or worse, peopleââ¬â¢s life. If there is, for example, a public and political consensus that the government should assist poor blind people, the definition worked out by a desktop administrator to answer the question who is poor and who is blind, has a dramatic influence to the nature of the program. Desktop administrators differ fundamentally from political executives in that most of them are career civil servants. After a short probation period, most earn job tenure, and usually are not fired. Tenure insulates the civil service from direct political interference in the day-to-day working of government. Job tenure protects civil servants from losing their jobs, but they may be reassigned to less important jobs of equal rank if they lose favor with political executives. Professionals Professionals make up the third major role-type in public organizations. The original meaning of the term profession was a ceremonial vow made when joining a religious community. This vow followed years of training and some certification that the acquired knowledge and appropriate norms of behavior justified an individualââ¬â¢s initiation. Modern professionals receive standard specific training that ends with certification. They also learn values and norms of behavior. Increasingly the work of public organizations depends on professionals and more and more professionals are involved in public administration. The work of professionals involves applying their general knowledge to the specific case and requires considerable autonomy and flexibility. An important difference between professional and non-professional work is who evaluates performance. Nonprofessionals are evaluated by their immediate supervisors. Professionals assert their independence from supervisors. Their work is evaluated by peer review of their colleagues and that has flaws: fellow professionals are sometimes more willing to overlook the mistakes of colleagues for different reasons. Street-level bureaucrats Street-level bureaucrats (social workers, police officers, public schoolà teachers, public health nurses, job and drug-counselors, etc.) are at the bottom or near the bottom of public organizations. Their authority does not come from rank, since they are at the bottom of hierarchy, but from the discretionary nature of their work. They deal with people and people are complex and unpredictable, they are not the same and require individual attention. A common complaint about public bureaucrats is that they treat everyone like a number; they ignore unique problems and circumstances. But there are only general guidelines how to deal with people (an abusive parent, an arrested, poor, old or sick person), and it is impossible to write better guidelines to make everyone happy. Street-level administrator must use judgment to apply rules and laws to unique situations, and judgment requires discretion. Given limited resources, public organizations want fewer, not more clients, and this is an important difference between public and private organizations, which attract more clients to earn more profit. And dependence of clients on street-level bureaucrats often create conflicts. Street-level bureaucrats work in situations that defy direct supervision. Even when supervisors are nearby, much work with clients is done privately. Most paperwork and computerized information systems attempt to control street-level bureaucrats, who in turn become skilled in filling out forms to satisfy supervisors while maintaining their own autonomy. Street-level bureaucrats are also policy-makers. They often decide what policies to implement, their beliefs can affect their work with clients, they may interpret the policy to benefit clients and vice versa, and thus they may change the policy while implementing it. Policy entrepreneurs The policy entrepreneur is generally considered to be the charismatic person at the top, though they can exist at all levels of an organization. They are strongly committed to specific programs and are strong managers. They are skilled in gathering support and guiding an idea into reality. The role requires conceptual leadership, strategic planning, and political activism. This role is both necessary and dangerous. They take risks and push limits, which is necessary for a dynamic government, but they also bend rules and sometimes lead policy astray. PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION: STAFFINGà AND TRAINING THE AGENCY An important task in the management of any enterprise, private or public, is the recruiting, selecting, promoting, and terminating of personnel and employee training. Recruiting Once jobs have been created, the recruitment starts, i.e. finding people to fill those jobs. Public administration in the United States has come a long way from the time of Andrew Jackson, when, in the popular view, government jobs could be performed by any individuals (or at least any men) with normal intelligence. Under Jackson and his successors, frequent rotation on office was encouraged; no particular prior training or experience was necessary for most jobs. Merit systems were designed for the most part to keep out the grossly incompetent, not to attract the highly qualified. Gradually, the pattern changed. The government began attracting especially competent applicants. Openings were more highly publicized, recruiting visits were made to college and university campuses, and wages were made more nearly competitive with those in the private sector. Active efforts were made to attract individuals who, in earlier times, would have been excluded from public employment because of their ethnic or racial backgrounds or because they were women. Examining and selecting Once applications have been received, the next step in the personnel process is examination. The term examination does not refer only to a pencil-and-paper test. Some judgments are made on the basis of an unassembled examination. That is, the application form itself may require sufficient information to permit the assignment of a score based on reported experience and education and on references. Another possibility, especially important for jobs requiring particular skills, is performance examination. Some jobs call for an oral examination, particularly those for which communication skills are especially important. One examination of special importance is the Professional and Administrative Career Examination (PACE). PACE is intended to select candidates for federal government careers rather than for particular jobs. The personnel agency (e.g. Civil Service Commission) considers the list with the names of the individuals with the highest examination scores from which it chooses the new employee. Considerable discretion is allowed in making the final choice. Following selection, the new employee is likely to serve a probationary period, often six months, during which removal is relatively easy. Personnel managers encourage supervisors to see this as an extension of the testing procedure, but few employees are, in fact, dismissed during this period. Evaluation The evaluation of employee performance is a further personnel function. Recently, the trend has been to formalize rating schemes and to regularize feedback to employees. Where possible, objective measures of the work completed are employed. In jobs where this is not possible, supervisors are encouraged to judge performance as accurately as possible using impressionistic techniques. By supplying a continuing record of performance, such evaluation can protect employees from capricious actions of a subjective supervisor. Continuing education in the public service Government is deeply involved with the further education and training of the employees. This involvement may range from relatively simple, in-house training sessions ââ¬â even on-the-job training ââ¬â to the financing of undergraduate or graduate education. Many universities, in cooperation with government agencies, have developed special programs for public employees, and the courses typically lasting for a week, may be conducted either at a university campus or at an agency site. The Federal Executive Institute in Charlottesville, Virginia, established in 1968, operated by the Civil Service Commission, provides managerial training for high-level federal executives. The commission also has regional training centers located throughout the country. Public personnel are also often given leaves for a semester or a year by their agency to pursue a degree at the doctoral level (the Doctor of Public Administration) or to fulfill a masterââ¬â¢s program. ELEMENTS AND MODELS OF A DECISION-MAKING PROCESS We all make decisions all the time. Some are small; some will have ramifications throughout our lives. Sometimes we make snap judgments that in retrospect seem wise. Other times we carefully weigh the pros and cons but are betrayed by fate. Often the most important decisions are nondecisions: we put things off, choose to ignore problems, or to avoid situations or people and later discover that inaction has consequences just as important as those resulting from action. Four processes of decision-making Whether small or large, short- or long-term, studied or impulsive, decision-making involves four major elements: problem definition, information search, choice, and evaluation. They are not sequential, they occur simultaneously. And it is often difficult to identify when a decision process begins and ends as most important choices are ongoing. Problem definition The first step in defining a problem is recognizing that it exists. Then, problems are plentiful; attention is scare. Selecting a problem for attention and placing it on the policy agenda is the most important element in policy making. When a problem is given attention, it gains focus and takes shape. How a problem is defined affects how it is addressed. The problem of the homeless is a good example. The people without home have always been with us. Most often they have been seen as people who because of their own weaknesses could not find work and afford homes. They were dismissed as drunks and drifters. So defined, the homeless remained a problem in the background ââ¬â a problem for the Salvation Army, not the government. But as their number grew, we began to take a closer look. We saw individuals discharged from mental institutions, the unemployed whose benefits had expired, and families unable to afford decent home. And we started seeing ââ¬Å"the homelessâ⬠as people in desperate situations. This change in our perception altered the decision process. Homelessness is now a focus of policy debate. Information search When we are only vaguely aware that a problem exists, our first step is often to learn more about it, and this learning is an important step in the decision-making. Acid rain is a good example. First in Europe and then in North America, people noticed that trees were dying, and a few scientists began to ask why. Pollution and changes in climate were explored. Out of this active search for information the problem gained definition: air pollution is killing trees. Then, the solutions were considered. Reducing acid rains requires costly reduction in pollution created in regions often at great distance from the dying trees. Thus, the information defined the nature of the policy-making. Information has always been central to governing, and governments are primary sponsors of research both in the sciences and humanities. Such research is driven by the interests of scholars and may not have immediate relevance to policy debate. But it may have important policy implications. For example, advances in lasers and genetic engineering influence defense and social policy in ways unanticipated by scientists or their government sponsors. Choice As problems are defined and information about problems and outcomes is examined, choices emerge. Weighing options and selecting are the most visible decision-making processes.à Sometimes choices are difficult and taking decisions is very hard, especially when choices are not clear and their results are unpredictable. Should we negotiate with terrorists? Do we want to save the lives of hostages, as family members prefer, or do we want to eliminate any incentive for future terrorism? The selection process does not necessarily require reasoned judgments; the compromises of group decision-making often produce results that only few individuals prefer; satisfying single interests often means ignoring the interests of others. Evaluation Decisions do not end with choices among alternatives. Decision-makingà involves evaluating the effects and actions. Evaluation may be formal (an official study of the results produced by a new government program) or informal (scanning the news, talking to colleagues). Whether formal or informal, evaluation is another form of information gathering after the choice. The distinction between information search and evaluation is arbitrary. Before decision makers reach conclusions, most try to anticipate outcomes. The most difficult aspect of evaluating choices is establishing the criteria. The most common criterion is the result ââ¬â if things turn out well we feel that we made the right choice. But in this case we may confuse good luck with good decision-making (consider the decision to have a surgery: all surgery involves risk, and if a person chooses to take the very slight risk to remove a small tumor and dies during surgery, was the decision wrong?). Results are not universal criteria for the quality of a decision. The evaluation of any decision-making must involve looking at results and processes as well as the situation faced by decision makers. Models of decision-making There is no right or wrong way to make decisions. Sometimes cautious deliberation is the best path; at other times risks are required. But scholars speak about two broad categories of models of decision-making: rational and nonrational models. Rational decisions are choices based on judgment of preferences and outcomes. They are not always turn out best and they do not eliminate the possibility of failure. Sometimes the goal is so important that it is rational to choose an option with little promise of payoff. Opting for experimental surgery is a rational choice over a life of pain. In nonrational models choices do not result from the deliberate balancing of pros and cons. These models share the assumption that the mix of rules and participants shape choices, and that decisions result from the varying (though not necessarily accidental) mix of ingredients. Most of governmental decisions are within these models. The decision process there is too complex to take into account multiple goals, alternatives and impacts of every alternative; the time required to take a decision is too short; theà finances are too thin to provide long researches. Taken to extremes, rational models reduce human judgment to computation, and nonrational models portray decision outcomes as the result of forces beyond individual control.à Both rational and nonrational models of the decision process are products of value-neutral social science. Values enter rational decision models only in the form of preferences, but they are generally defined in terms of self-interest. An emerging view of decision-making places a stronger emphasis on decisions as value statements. LEADERSHIP Leadership is the direction and guiding of other participants in the organization. Leadership differs in degree. Transactional leaders exchange rewards for services. They guide subordinates in recognizing and clarifying roles and tasks. They give their subordinates the direction, support, and confidence to fulfill their role expectations. They also help subordinates understand and satisfy their own needs and desires. They encourage better than average performance from their subordinates. They are good managers. Transformational leadership is more dramatic. Transformational leaders change the relationship of the subordinate and the organization. They encourage subordinates to go well beyond their original commitments and expectations. If transactional leaders expect diligence, transformational leaders foster devotion. These leaders have the ability to reach the souls of others to raise human consciousness. They raise the level of awareness and encourage people to look beyond their sel f-interest. Both forms of leadership are important. When people in positions of authority encourage subordinates to believe that their work is important ââ¬â not merely a fair exchange of pay for work ââ¬â motivation, commitment, and performance surpass routine expectations. Leadership is required for major changes and new directions, and without leadership government easily stagnates. When things go well or poorly we credit or blame the leader. We look for leadership in candidates for high office. But can we determine which job candidates are ââ¬Å"natural bornâ⬠leaders? Can we train employees so that they develop the required personality characteristics to become effective leaders? Over many years, investigators have hoped to identify leadership traits. It isà extremely difficult to know precisely what traits such diverse political leaders as Napoleon Bonaparte, Luther King, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Indira Ghandi, and Adolf Hitler shared in common. Yet many researches have attempted to identify universal characteristics of leadership and the following classification of the leadership traits is suggested: 1)capacity (intelligence, verbal facility, originality, judgment); 2)achievement (scholarship, knowledge, athletic accomplishments); 3)responsibility (dependability, initiative, persistence, aggressiveness, self-confidence, desire to excel); 4)participation (activity, sociability, cooperation, adaptability, humor); 5)status (socioeconomic position, popularity). Yet this list is not very helpful. Particular traits are neither necessary nor sufficient to become a leader. There are brilliant thinkers and talkers who are not leaders, and there are people who are not very intelligent and not blessed with verbal facility who are obvious leaders. The holding of a degree does not say enough of the holder and whether he would fit into a particular situation. In some situations the managerââ¬â¢s superior education may be even resented by less well educated organization members. It is obvious that some managers are better leaders than others, and if psychological traits do not explain the variations, what is the explanation? Some investigators emphasize the situational character of leadership. The ingredients of this parameter of leadership are the following: â⬠¢status, or position power ââ¬â the degree to which the leader is enabled to get the group members to comply with and accept his or her leadership (but leadership should not be confused with high position ââ¬â holding high office does not guarantee impact; despite the leaderââ¬â¢s formal power, he or she did not always get from subordinates the performance that was desired); â⬠¢leader-member relations ââ¬â acceptance of the leader by members and their loyalty to him or her; â⬠¢task-structure ââ¬â the degree to which the jobs of the followers are well defined; â⬠¢ability to recognize the most critical needs for organization members at the moment (physiological needs for food, sleep, etc. or safety needs for freedom from fear, for security and stability; needs for love, friends and contact; esteem needs for self-respect and the respect of others or needs for self-actualization, for a chieving oneââ¬â¢s potential). Defining leadership is a very difficult task butà rejecting the study of leadership would impoverish our understanding of governing.
Sunday, September 29, 2019
Thermoelectric generator
Plantation for providing the necessary infrastructure out this project successfully. I also thank Dry. S. Maryanne, Dean, School of Mechanical & Building Sciences for his support and continuously encouragement in completing the project. I express my genuine indebtedness to Mr.. C. Rammers Kumar, Senior Assai. Lecturer, School of Mechanical & Building Sciences whose whole hearted guidance and valuable suggestions throughout this project helped us in completing it successfully, without which the project would not have attained a fine and final shape.I would also like to express our gratitude to all faculty members of the school for their timely encouragement and thought provoking suggestion to pursue our work. Last but not he least, we would like to thank all those who were directly and indirectly helped us in completion of this project. CHAPTER: I 1. 0 Introduction Man's constant evolution couldn't have been possible without fuels. Society is putting more emphasis on the mobile transp ortation sector to achieve future goals of sustainability and on low thermal efficiencies of ICC engine.About 60% of heat-energy liberated during combustion of fuel is not utilized in producing useful work and getting dumped into the atmosphere daily. To achieve these goals, society needs to jump to a new method to recover the lost part of exhaust energy. The recovering of heat from exhaust gases in automobiles is a typical area of generating steam (or) electricity using W. H. R. B. * (or) Thermoelectric. It depends on the basic principle of ââ¬ËSpeck Effect'.It would be useful to demonstrate the potential of thermoelectric generation in the automobile industry using Thermoelectric Generator (Tee's). A thermoelectric generator, which can be driven by the temperature difference, incorporates fins into a thermopile to conduct heat toward or away from the alternating spaces between adjacent layers of different types of thermoelectric material. Vehicles are becoming more electrified and the higher electrical demands under nearly all driving conditions are required.On board electrical energy management and storage systems are more prevalent. TEE'S provides source of additional electrical power without increasing fuel consumption. The study reveals that about 6% of the exhaust energy can be taped from the exhaust there by increasing the thermal efficiency. It can be used to increase the overall efficiency of the engine without increasing the fuel consumption and thus there would be a separate source of the electricity that a vehicle needs for keeping its battery charged and for erring all of its on-board electric circuits. W. H. R. B. = Waste heat recovery boiler 1. 1 Problem Specification To design and fabricate the Thermo Electric Generator and its various components. To test the TAG under various conditions when used on Marti 800 standing engine. 1. 2 Objective To design the TAG and its various components using Silkworms (CAD) designing software and to fabrica te the same using various manufacturing processes. Then the manufactured model is tested for efficiency , power output under various conditions when tested with Marti 800 standing engine.CHAPTER: II 2 Literature Survey 2. 1 Thermoelectric Principle The Thermoelectric principle though established for long back found application only to the field of sensor industry. But recent advances in materials, especially in semi conductors have paved way for applications to the field of power generation. This project studies the application of Thermo electrics as a waste heat recovery solution in vehicles and their potential for the future. 2. 2 Speck Effect The Speck effect is the conversion of temperature differences directly into electricity.This effect was first discovered, accidentally, by the German-Estonian physicist Thomas Johann Speck in 1821 . He found that a voltage existed between wow ends of a metal bar when a temperature difference AT existed in the bar. Fig. 1. 3 ââ¬â Speck ef fect AS and SUB are the Speck coefficients of the metals A and B, and TTL and TO are the temperatures of the two Junctions. The Speck coefficients are non-linear, and depend on the conductors' absolute temperature, material, and molecular structure.If the Speck coefficients are effectively constant for the measured temperature range, the above formula can be approximated as: Thus, a thermocouple works by measuring the difference in potential caused by the dissimilar wires. It can be used to measure a temperature difference directly, or to assure an absolute temperature, by setting one end to a known temperature. Several thermocouples in series are called a thermopile. This is also the principle at work behind thermal diodes and thermoelectric generators (such as radioisotope thermoelectric generators or Arts) which are used for creating power from heat differentials. . 3 Semiconductor Based Thermoelectric Though the thermo-electric principle was established in the early 19th century , it was only after mid-20th Century advancements in semiconductor technology, however, that practical applications for thermoelectric devices became feasible. Semi- inducting materials, (in conjunction with copper inter-connecting pads), have been found to offer the best combination of Speck coefficient, electrical resistively, and thermal conductivity.Semi-conducting materials provide another benefit, the ability to use electrons or ââ¬Å"holesâ⬠(the absence of an electron in a crystal matrix) to conduct current. This last property is useful in assembling many thermoelectric Junctions in series to reduce the overall current flow in the device to manageable levels. 2. 4 Thermoelectric Modules (TEEMS) Bismuth Telluride-based thermoelectric modules are designed primarily for cooling r combined cooling and heating applications where electrical power creates a temperature difference across the module.By using the modules ââ¬Å"in reverse,â⬠however, whereby a temperature d ifferential is applied across the faces of the module, it is possible to generate electrical power. Although power output and generation efficiency are presently low, useful power often may be obtained where a source of heat is available. 2. 5 Teems for Power Generation Thermoelectric (ET) energy conversion for power generation is based on the ââ¬Å"Speck effectâ⬠, where a temperature difference, TTS-TTS, across two dissimilar legs of nonconductor material produces a voltage, Avocado.This voltage is equal to the Speck coefficient of the material, a, times the temperature difference across the device. The dissimilar legs of semiconductor material, one p-type and one n-type, are called a thermoelectric couple. The p- and n-legs are Joined by an electrically conducting material at the p-n Junction. A thermoelectric module consists of a series of p-n couples, which are connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel. Electrically insulating material separates the electr ical connectors from the heat source and sink.When a temperature gradient is applied across the couple, the negatively charged electrons, e-, in the n-leg and the positively charged holes, h+, in the p-leg move from the heat source to the heat sink, conducting heat to the cold base. This flow of electrons and holes causes separation in an initially uniform charge carrier distribution, which results in a current flow, l, in the couple. A thermoelectric module used for power generation has certain similarities to a conventional thermocouple. With no load, the open circuit voltage as measured between points a and b is: V = a.AT Where: V is the output voltage from the couple (generator) in volts a is the average Speck coefficient in volts/K AT is the temperature difference across the couple in K where When a load is connected to the thermoelectric couple the output voltage (V) drops as a result of internal generator resistance. The current through the load is: ââ¬Ëload = (a . I is th e generator output current in amperes RCA is the average internal resistance of the thermoelectric couple in ohms the load resistance in ohms The total heat input to the couple (Sq) is: Sq The . L) ââ¬â (0. 5. 12 . + (KC .CAT) Sq is the heat input in watts Kc is the thermal conductance of the couple in watts/K couple in K 2. 6 Module Selection The is the hot side of the The selection of the appropriate module for power generation with required voltage and current output was done on the basis of literature survey and was found that bismuth telluride module best suited to our condition because of its high efficiency and high operating temperature. Bismuth Telluride module was used because of its easy availability, low cost and low operating temperature range with a considerable efficiency.Material used for fabricating the outer frame is Cast Iron of 5 mm thickness, Cast Iron is used because of its cheap and easy availability. Outer Frame structure made on Solid Works Real time out er frame Full Assembly of the Chamber After the frame was manufactured, it was connected to the main setup as shown low, The setup included the catalytic converter attached to the Marti 800 engine. The inlet to the frame (TAG) is attached to the exit of the catalytic converter and the exit of the frame is to release the final exhaust gas to the atmosphere through a pipe.Here heat energy is converted into electric energy using thermoelectric module and therefore two plates are used in this experimental setup one is hot which is in direct contact with the exhaust gases flowing through the frame on one side and the other side of hot plate modules are placed and the other plate is cold plate which is assembled with cooling chamber as shown below, Hot plate used here is Aluminum of 5 mm thickness, one of which side is connected to frame exposed to exhaust gases directly.The picture below is the hot plate when modules are attached to it with the interface pads in between to increase the t hermal conductivity and to reduce the thermal resistance between the plate and the module. The cold plate which is assembled with cooling chamber is shown below, After connecting all this plates and module the entire frame structure is made to stand connected to the engine as shown above in one of the figure, and below shows he final completed set up with the exhaust pipe connected to the frame.
Saturday, September 28, 2019
Political Philosophy and M.a. Public Administration Essay
I. Greekà Politicalà Thoughtà Plato:à Justice,à Idealà Stateà Aristotle:à Theoryà ofà theà State,à Revolutions II. Medievalà andà Earlyà Modernà Politicalà Thoughtà Churchà andà theà State:à St. Augustineà Marsilioà ofà Paduaà Nicoloà Machiavelli:à Stateà andà Statecraft I. Socialà Contractà Theoryà Thomasà Hobbes:à Humanà Nature,à Sovereigntyà Johnà Locke:à Theoryà ofà Property,à Consentà andà Governmentà J. J. Rousseau:à Popularà Sovereignty II. Idealismà Immanuelà Kant:à Ethicsà andà Politicsà G. W. F. Hegel:à Stateà andà Civilà Societyà T. H. Green:à Theoryà ofà Rights. Recommendedà Books:à Sukhbirà Singh,à Historyà ofà Politicalà Thoughtà G. H. Sabine,à Aà Historyà ofà Politicalà Theory V. Krishnaà Rao,à Paschatyaà Rajanitià Tatvavicharamuà (inà Telugu)à Johnà Plamenatz,à Manà andà Societyà Ernestà Barker, Theà Politicalà Thoughtà ofà Platoà andà Aristotleà C. B. Macpherson,à Theà Politicalà Theoryà ofà Possessiveà Individualism M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà Ià (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà à academicà yearà 2002à 03)à PAPERà à à II:à ADMINISTRATIVEà THEORYà (Classical). Unità I. a). Introduction:à Publicà Administration à à Meaning,à Scopeà andà Significance. b). Woodrowà Wilson:à Politicsà andà Administrationà dichotomy. Unità II. a). Henrià Fayol:à Functionalismà b). F. W. Taylor:à Scientificà Managementà Theoryà Unità III:à a). Lutherà Gulickà andà Lyndalà Urwick:à Administrativeà Managementà Theory. b). Maxà Weberà :à Bureaucraticà Model. Unità IV:à a). Maryà Parkerà Follet:à Conflictà Resolutionà b). Chesterà Barnard:à Neoà Classicalà Model Readings: 1. Prasadà Rà andà Others(eds)à à à à :à Administrativeà Thinkers,à (Teluguà /à English)à ndà 2à Edition,à Sterling,à Newà Delhi. 2. S. P. Naiduà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à Publicà Administration:à Theoriesà andà Concepts,à Newà Ageà Internationalà Publications,à Hyderabad,à 1996. 3. Hoshiarà Singhà &à Pradeepà Sachdevaà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à Administrativeà Theory,à Kitabà Mahal,à Newà Delhi,à 1999. 4. Fredà Luthansà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à Organisationalà Behaviour. Studentsà areà requiredà toà consultà relevantà articlesà fromà journalsà relatingà toà publicà administrationà especiallyà theà Indianà Journalà ofà Publicà Administration M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà Ià (Commonà forà bothà à M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà from theà à academicà yearà 2002à 03)à PAPERà III:à INDIANà CONSTITUTION UNITà à Ià :à à à à (a)à Makingà ofà theà Indianà Constitution ââ¬âà Basicà Foundationsà ofà Indianà Constitutionà (b)à Salientà Featuresà à ofà Indianà Constitution UNITà IIà :à à (a)à à Fundamentalà Rightsà andà Directiveà Principlesà ofà Stateà Policyà (b)à Centre à Stateà Relations UNITà IIIà :à à (a)à à Unionà Governmentà ââ¬âà Parliament,à President,à Primeà Ministerà andà Cabinetà (b)à Supremeà Courtà andà Judicialà Review. UNITà IVà :à (a)à à Provisionsà forà theà Welfareà ofà Weakerà Sectionsà (b)à Reviewingà ofà theà Constitution ââ¬âà Sarkariaà à Commissionà andà Constitutionalà Reviewà Commission Referenceà Books:à 1. Granvilleà Austinà à à Theà Indianà Constitution ââ¬âà Cornerà Stoneà ofà theà Nationà 2. D. D. Basuà à à Introductionà toà theà Constitutionà ofà Indiaà 3. Morrisà Jones,à W. H. à à Theà Governmentà andà Politicsà ofà Indiaà 4. Kothari,à Rà à à Politicsà inà Indiaà 5. V. D. Mahajanà à à Indianà Constitutionà 6. J. C. Joharià à à Indianà Constitution M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à Ià (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà à academicà yearà 2002à 03)à PAPERà IV:à à GOVERNMENTà ANDà POLITICSà INà ANDHRAà PRADESH UNITà I:à a). Approachesà toà theà Studyà ofà Stateà Governmentà andà Politics. b). Politicalà History ofà theà Stateà Formationà ofà Andhraà Pradesh. UNITà II:à a)à Constitutionalà Structuresà b)à Politicalà Partiesà UNITà III:à a). Subà Regionalà Movements:à Separateà Telanganaà Movementà andà Jaià And haraà Movement. b). Peasantà Movements:à Telanganaà Armedà Struggleà andà Naxaliteà Movement. UNITà IV:à a). Publicà Sectorà andà Politicsà ofà Subsidyà b). Liberalization. BOOKSà RECOMMENDED: 1. Myronà Weinerà (ed. )à 2. Iqbalà Narainà 3. Reddyà &à Sharma(eds. )à 4. V. Hanumanthaà Raoà 5. K. V. Narayanaà Raoà 6. Srià Prakashà 7. S. C. Kashyapà 8. Ashokà Senà 9. Babulalà Fadiaà 10. B. A. V. Sharmaà 11. Barryà Pavierà 12. G. Ramà Reddy Stateà Politicsà inà India. à à Stateà Politicsà in India. à Stateà Governmentà &à Politicsà inà A. P. .à à à Partyà Politicsà inà Andhraà Pradesh. à à Emergenceà ofà Andhraà Pradesh. à à Stateà Governorsà inà India. à à Politicsà ofà Defections:à Aà Studyà ofà Stateà Politicsà inà India. à à Roleà ofà Governorsà inà theà Emergingà Patternsà ofà Centerà Stateà Relationsà inà India. à à Stateà Politicsà inà India. à à Politicalà Economyà ofà India. à à Telanganaà Movementà 1944à 51. à Panchayatià Rajà andà Ruralà Developmentà inà A. P M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à Ià (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà à academicà yearà 2002à 03) PAPERà Và aà (OPTIONAL):à POLITICALà INSTITUTIONSà ANDà IDEASà INà ANCIENTà INDIA UNITà à à I:à Politicalà Ideasà inà theà earlyà periodà a)à Samhitasà andà Brahmanasà b)à Principalà Upanishads. UNITà à II:à Politicalà ideasà inà Dharmasastrasà a)à Apatstambha,à Yagnovalkyaà andà Manu. b)à Mahabharata. UNITà III:à Politicalà Ideasà inà Anti à à Vedicà Literature. a)à Earlyà Buddhistà Literature. b)à Earlyà Jainà Literature. UNITà IV:à Technicalà Worksà onà Polity. a)à Predecessorsà ofà Kautilya. b)à Kautilyaââ¬â¢sà Arthasastra. BOOOKSà REOMMENDED:à 1. Cambridgeà Historyà ofà India,à vol. I. 2. Ghoshalà 3. Jayaswalà 4. Rangaswamià Aiyanagarà 5. Bandopadhyayaà 6. Kane,à P. V. 7. D. Machenzieà Brownà 8. Spellmanà 9. Altaker,à A. S. 10. Saletore,à B. A. Historyà ofà Hinduà Politicalà Theoryà à à Hinduà Polityà à à Rajadharmaà à à Developmentà ofà Hinduà Politicalà Theoriesà à Historyà ofà Dharmaà Sastra,à Vol. IIIà à à Theà Whiteà Umbrellaà à à Theà Politicalà Theoryà ofà Ancientà Indiaà à à Stateà andà Governmentà inà Ancientà Indiaà à à Ancientà Indianà Politicalà Thoughtà andà Institutions M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à Ià (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà Studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03)à PAPERà Và bà (OPTIONAL):à WOMENà ANDà POLITICSà Unità à à I:à THEORITICALà APPROACHESà i)à Politicalà Philà ii)à osophersà onà Women:à Plato,à Aristotleà Rousseau,à J. S. Millà andà Karlà Marxà iii)à Liberalà andà Radicalà Approachesà iv)à Maryà Woolstoneà Craftà andà Simonà deà Beauvoirà WOMENà ANDà THEà INDIANà STATEà i)à Indianà Constitutionà andà Womenà ii)à Committeeà onà theà Statusà ofà Women à à 1975à iii)à Nationalà Policiesà onà Womenà WOMENà ANDà POLITICALà PARTICIPATIONà i)à Womenà andà Nationalistà Movementà ii)à Womenââ¬â¢sà Electoralà Participation à à Trendsà à à Nationalà andà Stateà iii)à Womenââ¬â¢sà Movementà inà Indiaà à à Perspectivesà andà Strategiesà RESERVATIONà à THEà EXPERIENCEà OFà PANCHAYATIà RAJà i)à Theà Debateà onà Womenââ¬â¢sà Reservationà rdà thà ii)à 73à andà 74à Constitutionalà Amendmentsà iii)à Lessonsà fromà theà Experience. Unità à à II: Unità à à III: Unità à à IV: READINGà LIST:à 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Charvetà John,à Feminism à à Modernà Ideologiesà Series,à J. M. Devtà &à Sonsà London,à 1982à Evaà Figes,à Patriarchalà Attitudesà Womenà inà Society,à Newà Delhi:à Macmillan,à 1985 .à Agnewà Vijay, Eliteà Womenà inà Indianà Politics,à Vikas,à Newà Delhi,à 1979. Susheelaà Kaushik, (ed. ),à Womenââ¬â¢sà Participationà inà Politics. Dianaà Coole,à Womenà inà Politicalà Theory. Simonà deà Beauvoir,à Theà Secondà Sex. Vickyà Randallà :à Womenà andà Politics,à Macmillan,à London,à 1982. Governmentà ofà India,à Ministryà ofà Educationà andà Socialà Welfare:à Towardsà Equality:à Reportà ofà theà Committeeà onà theà Statusà ofà Women,à Newà Delhi,à 1974. 9. Geraldineà Forbes:à Womenà inà Modernà India,à Newà Delhi,à Cambridgeà Universityà Press,à 1996. 10. Veenaà Mazumdarà (ed. )à ,à Symbolsà ofà Power. 11. Issuesà ofà Panchayatià Raj à à Update à Instituteà ofà Socialà Sciences,à Newà Delhi. OLD M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà ANDà M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à Ià (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà andà M. A. Publicà Administrationà Studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2006à 07)à PAPERà Và bà (OPTIONAL):à WOMENà ANDà POLITICSà Unità à à I:à THEORITICALà APPROACHESà i)à à à à à à à à à Ancientà Politicalà Philosophersà onà Women ââ¬âà Plato,à Aristotleà Rousseau. ii)à Modernà Liberalà Thinkers:à à Maryà Woostonecraft,à J. S. Millà iii)à Radialà thinkersà ââ¬âà Karlà Marxà andà Angels,à Simonà deà Beauboir,à Kateà Millet. WOMENà ANDà THEà INDIANà STATEà i)à Indianà Constitutionà andà Womenà ii)à Committeeà onà theà Statusà ofà Women à à 1975à iii)à Nationalà Policiesà onà Women ââ¬âà 1988à andà 2001. WOMENà ANDà POLITICALà PARTICIPATIONà i)à Womenà andà Nationalistà Movementà ii)à Womenââ¬â¢sà Electoralà Participation à à Trendsà à à Nationalà andà Stateà iii)à Womenââ¬â¢sà Movementà inà Indiaà à à Perspectivesà andà Strategiesà RESERVATIONà à THEà EXPERIENCEà INà LOCALà GOVERNMENTà i)Theà Debateà onà Womenââ¬â¢sà Reservationà rdà thà ii)à 73à andà 74à Constitutionalà Amendmentsà iii)à Womenââ¬â¢sà Politicalà participation ââ¬âà problemsà andà prospects. Unità à à II: Unità à à III: Unità à à IV: READINGà LIST:à 1. Charvetà John,à Feminism à à Modernà Ideologiesà Series,à J. M. Devtà &à Sonsà London,à 1982à 2à à à à à Evaà Figes,à Patriarchalà Attitudesà Womenà inà Society,à Newà Delhi:à Macmillan,à 1985. 3à à à à à Agnewà Vijay,à Eliteà Womenà inà Indianà Politics,à Vikas,à Newà Delhi,à 1979. 4à à à à à Susheelaà Kaushik,à (ed. ),à Womenââ¬â¢sà Participationà inà Politics. 5à à à à à Dianaà Coole,à Womenà inà Politicalà Theory. 6à à à à à Simonà deà Beauvoir,à Theà Secondà Sex. 7à à à à à Vickyà Randallà :à Womenà andà Politics,à Macmillan,à London,à 1982. 8à à à à Governmentà ofà India,à Ministryà ofà Educationà andà Socialà Welfare:à Towardsà Equality:à Reportà ofà theà Committeeà onà theà Statusà ofà Women,à Newà Delhi,à 1974. 9à Geraldineà Forbes:à Womenà inà Modernà India,à Newà Delhi,à Cambridgeà Universityà Press,à 1996. 10à Veenaà Mazumdarà (ed. )à ,à Symbolsà ofà Power. 11. Issuesà ofà Panchayatià Raj à à UPDATEà à Instituteà ofà Socialà Sciences,à Newà Delhi. M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (FROMà THEà ACADEMICà YEARà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà ââ¬âà Ià COMPARATIVEà PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà UNITà I:à COMPARATIVEà PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà ââ¬âà HISTORYà ANDà CONCEPTà 1. Evolutionà ofà Comparativeà Publicà Administration ââ¬âà Comparativeà Administrationà Groupà (CAG)à 2. Definition,à Scopeà andà Importanceà ofà Comparativeà Publicà Administrationà 3. Comparativeà Elementsà inà Earlierà Administrativeà Theory. UNITà à IIà à à ? MODELSà INà COMPARATIVEà PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà 1. Bureaucraticà Modelà 2. Ecologicalà Modelà 3. Administrativeà Systemsà Modelà UNITà à IIIà à :à COMPARATIVEà ADMINISTRATIVEà SYSTEMSà à à à à à à à . 1. Administrativeà Systemsà ofà Developedà Nationsà :à USAà andà UKà 2. Administrativeà Systemsà ofà Developingà Countriesà 3. Administrativeà Systemsà ofà Communistà Statesà UNITà ââ¬â IVà à :à à COMPARATIVEà PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà :à RECENTà TRENDSà 1. Internationalà Administrationà 2. Globalà Publicà Administrationà 3. Comparativeà Publicà Administration:à Declineà andà Revival. Referenceà Books:à Ferrelà Headyà :à Publicà Administrationà :à Aà Comparativeà Perspectiveà R. K. Aroraà :à Comparativeà Publicà Administrationà :à Anà Ecologicalà Perspectiveà Viswanathanà :à Comparativeà Publicà Administrationà T. N. Chaturvedià andà V. P. Vermaà (eds. )à : Comparativeà Publicà Administrationà Alià Farazmandà :à Handbookà ofà Comparativeà andà Developmentà Administrationà Jeanà Claudeà Gareiaà Zamorà andà Renuà Khator:à à Publicà Administrationà inà theà Globalà Villageà 7. C. V. Raghavuluà andà M. Bapujià :à Tulanatmakaà Prabhutvaà Palana,à Teluguà Academyà (inà Telugu) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà à II:à à PUBLICà PERSONNELà ADMINISTRATION. Unità à I:à 1. Introductionà toà Publicà Personnelà Administration:à à Meaning,à Definitionà Scopeà andà Significance. 2. Publicà Service:à Conceptà andà Roleà inà Modernà State. Unità à II:à 1. Recruitment:à à Recruitmentà andà Selectionà Process,à Recruitmentà Policy,à Recruitmentà Methods,à Inductionà andà Placement. 2. Classification:à à Classificationà ofà Services:à à Roleà Classificationà andà Positionà Classification. Unità à III:à 1. Manà Powerà Planning/Humanà Resourceà Planning:à Meaningà Importance,à Supplyà andà Demandà Forecast. 2. Careerà Planning:à à Meaningà andà Process,à Jobà Enrichmentà andà Capacityà Building. Unità à IV:à 1. Payà andà Serviceà Conditions:à à Payà Principles,à Payà Determinationà Andà Payà Commissions. 2. Discipline:à à Conduct,à Disciplineà andà Supeannuation. Referenceà Books:à 1. Glennà O. Sthalà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Publicà Personnelà Administrationà 2. Felixà A. Nigroà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Publicà Personnelà Administrationà 3. Pfiffnerà andà Presthusà à à à à :à à à Publicà Administration 4. S. R. Maheswarià à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Indianà Administrationà 5. Avasthià andà Maheswarià :à à à Publicà Administrationà 6. Rameshà K. Aroraà andà Rajnià Goyalà à :à à Indianà Publicà Administrationà 7. Reportà ofà Administrativeà Reformsà Commissionà onà Personnelà Administration M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà à à III:à INDIANà ADMINISTRATIONà Unità à à I:à a). Theà legacyà ofà Indianà Administration à à Evolution à à Kautilyaà à à Moghalà periodà à à Britishà periodà andà Constitutionalà Framework. b)à . Structureà ofà Indianà Administrationà :à Primeà Ministerââ¬â¢sà roleà à à Centralà Secretariatà à Cabinetà Secretariatà à PMOà c). Allà Indiaà servicesà à à UPSCà Unità à II:à à Stateà Administrationà a). Stateà Secretarialà :à Chiefà Secretary à Stateà Services. b). Roleà ofà Districtà Collector. c). Planningà Machineryà atà theà Stateà level à à Districtà Planning. Unità à III:à Issuesà ofà Indianà Bureaucracyà a). Politicalà Executiveà andà Bureaucracyà b). Indianà Bureaucracy:à Aà caseà forà representatives. c). Theà Generalistà andà theà Specialistà inà Indianà Administration. Unità IV:à a). Administrationà ofà Planning:à Planningà Commissionà andà Nationalà Developmentà council. b). Centreà à Stateà Administrativeà Relations. c). Peopleââ¬â¢sà Participationà inà Grassrootsà Developmentà à à Janmaà Bhoomi à à Microà Planning. Unità V:à a). Citizenà à Administration à à Redressalà ofà Citizensââ¬â¢Ã Grievancesà à à Lokpalà andà Lokayuktaà inà Andhraà Pradesh. b). Corruptionà inà Indianà Publicà Lifeà à à Roleà ofà Centralà Vigilanceà Commission. c). Administrativeà Reformsà andà innovationsà inà India. Readings:à 1. Rameshà k. Aroraà andà Rajnià Goyalà :à Indianà Publicà Administration,à Wishwaà Prakashan,à Newà Delhi,à 1995. 2. Hoshiarà Singhà andà Mohinderà singh:à Publicà Administrationà inà India,à Sterling,à Newà Delhi,à 1995. 3. Hoshiarà Singhà :à Indianà Administrationà 4. R. B. Jainà :à Contemporaryà issuesà inà Indianà Administration,à Vishal,à Delhi,à 1976. 5. Haridwarà Raià andà S. P. Singhà :à Currentà Ideasà andà issuesà inà Publicà Administration,à thà 6. S. R. Maheswarià :à Indianà Administrationà (5à Edition)à 7. J. C. Joharià :à Indianà Politicalà System. 8. Hariharadasà :à Politicalà Systemà ofà India. Studentsà areà requiredà toà consultà relevantà articlesà fromà journalsà relatingà toà publicà administrationà especiallyà theà Indianà Journalà ofà Publicà Administration M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà ââ¬âà IVà à PANCHAYATIà RAJà INà INDIA UNITà ââ¬âà Ià à :à à INTRODUCTIONà 1. Definition,à Scopeà andà Importanceà ofà Local à à Selfà Government. 2. Historyà ofà Ruralà Local ââ¬âà Selfà Governmentà inà Indiaà ââ¬âà Ancient,à Medievalà andà Britishà Periods. UNITà ââ¬âà IIà à :à à PANCHAYATIà RAJà SYSTEMà ââ¬â NATIONALà PERSPECTIVEà rdà Genesisà andà Developmentà ofà Panchayatià Raj ââ¬âà Significanceà ofà 73à Constitutionalà à Amendmentà Actà 2. Boardà Patternà ofà Panchayatià Rajà System ââ¬âà Structureà andà Functionà 1. UNITà ââ¬âà IIIà :à à à PANCHAYATIà RAJà SYSTEMà INà ANDHRAà PRADESHà 1. Importantà à Featuresà ofà theà A. P. Panchayatià Rajà Actà ofà 1994. 2. Functioningà ofà Panchayatià Rajà Institutions. UNITà ââ¬âà IVà :à à à PANCHAYATIà RAJà SYSTEM:à IMPORTANTà AREASà 1. Panchayatià Rajà Financesà ââ¬âà Roleà ofà Stateà Financeà Commissionà 2. Panchayati Raj ââ¬âà Stateà Relations Referenceà Books:à 1. S. R. Maheswarià à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Localà Governmentà inà Indiaà 2. G. Ramà Reddyà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à Patternsà ofà Pancharatià Raj. 3. B. S. Khannaà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à Panchayatià Rajà inà Indiaà 4. M. Bapujià :à à à Tulanaatmakaà Sthaanikaà Prabhutwaluà (Comparativeà Localà Governments)à inà Telugu,à Telugu M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà ââ¬âà V. aà (Optional)à POLICEà ADMINISTRATION UNITà ââ¬âà Ià à :à à INTRODUCTIONà 1. Natureà andà Importanceà Policeà Administrationà 2. Originà andà Growthà ofà Policeà Administrationà à inà Indiaà 3. Policeà Administrationà inà Andhraà Pradesh:à Salientà Features. UNITà à à 11à :à à à STRUCTUREà OFà POLICEà ADMINISTRATIONà 1. Policeà Administrationà atà Centralà Levelà 2. Policeà Administrationà atà Stateà andà Districtà Levelsà 3. Policeà Administrationà atà Cuttingà Edge. UNITà ââ¬âà IIIà :à à à HUMANà RESOURCEà ASPECTSà OFà POLICEà ADMINISTRATIONà 1. Recruitmentà andà Trainingà 2. Moraleà andà Motivationà 3. Policeà à à Codeà ofà Conductà andà Disciplinaryà Rules. UNITà ââ¬âà IVà :à à à SOMEà IMPORTANTà ISSUESà 1. Publicà ââ¬âà Policeà Relationsà 2. Reformsà inà Policeà Administrationà 3. Policeà andà Tradeà Unionà Rights Referenceà Books:à 1. R. K. Bhardwajà à à à à à :à à Indianà Policeà Administrationà 2. Girijaà Shahà à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à Modernà Policeà Administrationà 3. S. Senà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à Policeà inà Democraticà Stateà 4. J. Singhà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à Insideà Indianà Policeà 5. Favrean,à Donaldà andà Gillespic,à Josephà E. ,à Modernà Policeà Administration M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà SEMESTERà à à IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à ââ¬âà 2004)à PAPERà ââ¬âà V. b(Optional)à SOCIALà WELFAREà à ADMINISTRATION UNITà ââ¬âà 1à :à à INTRODUCTIONà 1. Conceptsà ofà Welfareà andà Socialà Welfareà 2. Meaning,à Scopeà andà Importanceà ofà Socialà Welfareà Administrationà UNITà ââ¬âà IIà :à à SOCIALà WELFAREà ADMINISTRATIONà INà INDIAà 1. Socialà Welfareà à Policiesà ofà Governmentà ofà Indiaà 2. Structureà ofà Socialà Welfareà Administrationà atà theà Centre,à Stateà andà Districtà levelsà UNITà ââ¬âà IIIà :à à WELFAREà SCHEMESà ANDà PROGRAMMESà CONCERNINGà 1. Scheduledà Castesà andà Scheduledà Tribesà 2. Womenà andà Childrenà UNITà ââ¬âà IVà :à à à AGENCIESà OFà SOCIALà WELFAREà 1. Governmentalà Agenciesà 2. Nonà Governmentalà Agencies. Referenceà Books:à 1. T. S. Simeyà :à à à à Principlesà ofà Socialà Administrationà 2. Paulà D. Chowduryà :à à à Socialà Welfareà Administrationà inà Indiaà 3. F. W. Reidà :à à à à Socialà Welfareà Administrationà 4. Walterà A. Forieldlanderà :à à Introductionà toà Socialà Welfare. M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04)à PAPERà ââ¬âà Ià à COMPARATIVEà à POLITICSà UNIT. Ià :à à INTRODUCTIONà 1. Meaning,à Natureà andà Scopeà ofà Comparativeà Politicsà 2. Growthà ofà theà Studyà ofà Comparativeà Politicsà 3. Majorà Approachesà toà Comparativeà Politicsà UNIT. IIà :à à à POLITICALà DEVELOPMENTà ANDà POLITICALà DEPENDENCYà 1. Conceptà ofà Developmentà Syndromeà ââ¬âà Lucianà Pyeà 2. Centreà Periphery ââ¬âà Thirdà Worldà Perspectiveà 3. Originà andà Relevanceà ofà Dependencyà Theoryà UNIT. IIIà :à à POLITICALà IDEOLOGYà ANDà PARTYà SYSTEMSà 1. Politicalà Ideology:à Meaning,à Natureà andà Generalà Characteristicsà 2. Ideologiesà ofà Liberalism,à Fascismà andà Marxismà 3. Nature,à Functionsà andà Typologyà ofà Partyà Systemsà UNIT. IVà :à à CONSTITUTINALISMà 1. Meaningà andà Developmentà ofà theà Termà 2. Constitutionalismà inà theà Westà ââ¬â England,à Franceà andà Americaà 3. Problemsà andà Prospectsà of Constitutionalismà inà Developingà Countries Readingà List:à 1. Gabrielà Almondà andà Binghamà Powellà à à :à à Comparativeà Politics:à Aà Developmentà Approachà 2. Lucianà Pyeà :à à à Aspectsà ofà Politicalà Developmentà 3. J. C. Joharià à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Comparativeà Politicsà 4. Howard,à J. Wiardaà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à Newà Directionsà inà Comparativeà Politicsà 5. Mortan R. Daviesà &à Vaughamà A. Lewis:à à à à Modelsà ofà Politicalà Systemà 6. S. N. Rayà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à Modernà Comparativeà Politicsà 7. Gwendolenà Carterà &à Johnà H. Herzà à à à à à à à :à à à à Governmentà andà Politicsà inà theà Twentiethà Centuryà 8. Samuel,à H. Beerà à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à Modernà Politicalà Development M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04) PAPERà ââ¬âà IIà APPROACHESà ANDà THEORYà INà INTERNATIONALà RELATIONS UNIT. Ià :à à à à à a)à à à Introductionà :à à Theà Natureà ofà Internationalà Relationsà b)à à Normativeà Approaches,à à Structuralismà andà Neoà Realismà UNIT. IIà :à à à à a)à à à Power,à Influenceà andà Authority,à Realisticà Theoryà b)à Decision ââ¬âà Makingà Analysisà UNIT. IIIà :à à à à a)à Systemsà Approachà b)à Commun icationà Theoryà UNITà . IVà :à à à a)à à Integrationà Theory,à Marxistà Perspectiveà b)à Peaceà Research Referenceà Books:à 1. Bullà Hà :à Internationalà Theory:à Theà Caseà forà Classicalà Approach,à Worldà Politicsà 2. Knorr,à K,,à &à Rosenau,à J. N. :à à à Contendingà Approachesà toà Internationalà Politicsà 3. Clude,à I. :à à à Powerà andà Internationalà Relationsà 4. Herz,à J. H. :à à à Internationalà Politicsà inà Atomicà Ageà 5. Kaplan,à M. :à à à Systemà andà Processà inà Internationalà Politicsà 5. Trevorà Taylor(ed. )à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à :à à à Approachesà andà Theoryà inà Internationalà Relationsà 6. Margotà Lightà andà A. J. R. Groomà :à à Internationalà Relationsà ââ¬âà Aà Handbookà ofà Currentà Theory M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04)à PAPERà III:à MODERNà POLITICALà THEORYà Introductoryà Theà Natureà ofà Politicalà Theoryà Influenceà ofà Positivismà onà Politicalà Theoryà Empiricalà Politicalà Theoryà Perspectivesà onà theà Modernà State:à Liberalà andà Marxistà Centralà Conceptsà Relatedà toà theà Modernà Stateà Legitimacy:à Legitimationà Crisisà ofà theà Modernà Stateà Rights:à Naturalà Rights,à Welfareà Rightsà Liberty:à Negativeà andà Positiveà Liberty? Marxianà Notionà ofà Libertyà Justice:à Differentà Conceptionsà Newà Directionsà Postà Modernism:à Michelà Foucaultà onà Powerà Feministà Perspectivesà onà Patriarchyà andà Powerà Communitarianismà Issuesà andà Ideasà inà Contemporaryà Politicalà Theory Endà ofà History:à Francisà Fukuyamaà Clashà ofà Civilizations:à Samuelà Huntingtonà Thirdà Way:à Anthonyà Giddensà Postà Liberalism:à Johnà Gray Recommendedà Books:à S. P. Varma,à Modernà Politicalà Theoryà Madanà G. Gandhi,à Modernà Politicalà Theoryà J. C. Johari,à Contemporaryà Politicalà Theoryà III. Davidà Miller,à Socialà Justiceà Robertà Dahl,à Modernà Politicalà Analysisà N. Barry,à Anà Introductionà toà Modernà Politicalà Theoryà Michaelà Freeden,à Rightsà Zygmuntà Bauman,à Freedomà Davidà Held,à Politicalà Theoryà andà theà Modernà Stateà Andrewà Vincent,à Theoriesà ofà theà Stateà Vidhuà Varma,à Justice,à Equalityà andà Community:à Anà Essayà inà Marxistà Theoryà Michelà Foucault,à Power/Knowledgeà Dianaà Coole,à Womenà inà Politicalà Theoryà Francisà Fukuyama,à Theà Endà ofà Historyà andà theà Lastà Manà Samuelà J. Huntington,à Theà Clashà ofà Civilizationsà andà theà Remakingà ofà Worldà Orderà Anthonyà Giddens,à Theà Thirdà Wayà Johnà Gray,à Postà liberalism:à Studiesà inà Politicalà Thought M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04)à PAPERà ââ¬âà IV:à MODERNà INDIANà POLITICALà THOUGHT UNITà ââ¬âà 1à :à à Foundationsà à ofà Modernà Indianà Politicalà Thoughtà 1. Rammohanà Royà 2. Dayanandaà Saraswatià 3. Balaà Gangadharaà Tilakà UNITà ââ¬âà IIà :à à Gandhianà Thoughtà 1. Nonà à Violenceà andà Satyagrahaà 2. Relationshipà betweenà Meansà andà Ends. 3. Conceptà ofà Stateà andà Government. UNITà à à IIIà :à à à Socialistà andà Humanistà Thoughtà 1. Ramà Manoharà Lohiaà 2. Jawaharlalà Nehruà 3. M. N. Royà UNITà à IVà :à à Problemà ofà Minoritiesà andà Backwardà Socialà Groupsà 1. M. A. Jinnahà 2. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, Generalà Readings:à 1. Sankarà Ghoseà ,à Modernà Indianà Politicalà Thoughtà 2. O. P. Goyal? Studiesà inà Modernà Indianà Politicalà Thoughtà 3. G. N. Sarmaà andà Moinà Shakir,à Politicsà andà Society:à à Ramà Mohanà Royà toà Nehruà 4. V. P. Varma,à Modernà Indianà Politicalà Thought Recommendedà Readings:à thà 1. A. Appadorai,à Indianà Politicalà Thinkingà inà theà 20à Centuryà fromà Naorojià toà Nehruà 2. O. P. Goyal,à Contemporaryà Indianà Politicalà Thoughtà 3. A. M. Zaidi,à Encylopaediaà ofà Indianà Nationalà Congressà (Studentsà shouldà referà relevantà sectionsà inà à differentà Volumes)à 4. Bipinà Chandra,à Nationalismà andà Colonialismà inà Modernà Indiaà 5. A. R. Desai,à Socialà Backwardà ofà Indianà Nationalismà 6. Thomasà Panthamà andà Deutsch,à Modernà Politicalà Thoughtà inà Indiaà 7. K. P. Karunakaran,à Democracyà inà India M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04)à PAPERà ââ¬âà V. aà (Optional):à DIPLOMACYà UNITà à Ià :à 1. Theà Natureà andà Originsà ofà Modernà Diplomacy. 2. Theà Developmentà ofà Diplomaticà Theoryà UNITà à IIà :à 1. Theà Transitionà fromà Oldà Diplomacyà toà Newà Diplomacyà 2. Democraticà Diplomacyà UNITà à IIIà :à 1. Recentà Changesà inà Diplomaticà Practiceà 2. Pointsà ofà Diplomaticà Procedureà UNITà à IVà :à 1. Propagandaà andà Diplomacyà 2. Diplomacyà inà theà UN Referenceà Books:à 1. Bailey,à Sydneyà B. :à à à Theà Generalà Assemblyà ofà theà Unitedà Nations,à Stevensà 2. Bowles,à Chester. :à à à Ambassadorââ¬â¢sà Report,à NY,à Haperà 3. Briggs,à Hebertà W. :à à à Theà Lawà ofà Nations,à NY,à Appletonà Centuryà Croftsà 4. Carr,à E. H. :à à à à Theà Twentyà Yearsà ofà Crisis,à London,à Macmillanà 5. Huddlestonà Sisleyà à à à à à à à :à à à à Popularà Diplomacyà andà War,à Peterboroughà 6. Krishnaà Murthy,à G. V. G:à à à Dynamicsà ofà Diplomacy,à Nationalà Publishingà House,à Newà Delhià 7. Nicolsonà Haroldà à à à à à à à à à :à à à à à Diplomacy,à London,à Oxfordà Universityà Pressà 8. Plischke,à Elmerà à à à à à à à à à à :à à à à à Summità Diplomacy,à Marylandà 9. Satowà Sirà Ernestà à à à à à à à à :à à à à à Aà Guideà toà Diplomaticà Practice,à Longmans M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà SEMESTERà ââ¬âà IIIà (Fromà theà academicà yearà 2003à 04)à PAPERà ââ¬âà Và bà (Optional):à POLITICALà ECONOMY UNITà à I:à Theoriesà ofà Politicalà Economy? a)à Classicalà Politicalà Economy à à Adamà Smithà andà Davidà à à Ricardo. b)à Marxianà Politicalà Economy. UNITà à à II:à a)à Theoriesà ofà Underdevelopmentà à A. G. Frank,à Samirà Amin. b)à Liberalizationà andà itsà Implicationsà forà Nationalà Economies. UNITà à III:à a)à Impactà ofà Colonialà Ruleà onà Indianà Economy. b)à Indianà Economy:à Importantà Features. UNITà IV:à a)à Stateà Directedà Economy. b)à Structuralà Adjustment. BOOKSà RECOMMENDED:à 1. Koxlou,à G. A. 2. Afanasye,à L. 3. Bardan,à Pranabà 4. Howard,à M. C. 5. Bagchi,à A. K. 6. Frankelà & Frankelà 7. Amartyaà Senà 8. Robertà Lucasà andà Gustavà Planackà 9. Ranjità Sauà 10. C. T. Kureinà 11. D. J. Byresà 12. Michealà Clossudoskyà 13. Parthaà Chatterjeà 14. B. A. V. Sharmaà à à Politicalà Economyà ofà Socialismà à à Politicalà Economyà ofà Capitalismà à à Politicalà Economyà ofà Developmentà inà Indiaà à à Politicalà Economyà ofà Marxà à à Politicalà Economyà ofà Underà Development. à à Politicalà Economyà ofà India,à 1947à 77. à à Commoditiesà andà Capabilities. à à Indianà Economy:à Recentà Developmentsà andà Futureà Prospect. à à Indianà Economicà Development. à à Globalisationà andà Indianà Economy. à à Theà Stateà Developmentà Planningà andà Liberalisationà inà India. à à Theà Globalisationà ofà Poverty. à à Stateà andà Politicsà inà India. à à Politicalà Economyà ofà India. M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà &à M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATION Semesterà ââ¬âà II (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà &à M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03) Paperà ââ¬â IIà :à Westernà Politicalà Thoughtà ââ¬â II. 1. Liberalismà Adamà Smith:à Politicalà Economyà Jeremyà Benthan:à Principleà ofà Utility J. S. Mill:Liberty,à Representativeà Governmentà 2. Contemporaryà à Liberalismà F. A. Hayekà onà Libertyà Robertà Nozick:à Minimalà Stateà Johnà Rawis:à Theoryà ofà Justiceà 3. Socialismà Earlyà Socialists:à Saintà Simonà andà Robertà Owenà Marlà Marx:à Critiqueà ofà Capitalism,à Revolutionà Antonioà Gramsci:à Civilà Societyà andà Hegemonyà 4. Revisionsà toà Socialismà Revisionsà toà Marxism:à Eduardà Bemsteinà Criticalà theory:à Herbertà Marcuseà Postà Marxism:à Emestoà Laclauà Recentà Trendsà inà Socialistà Theory. Recommendedà Books:à Sukhabirà Singh,à Historyà ofà Politicalà Thoughtà G. H. Sabine,à Aà Historyà ofà Politicalà Theoryà Anthonyà Crespignyà andà Kennethà Minlgue,à Contemporaryà Politicalà Philosophersà Bhikuà Parekh,à Contemporaryà Politicalà Thinkersà V. Krishnaà Rao,à Paschatyaà Rajanitià Tatvavicharamuà (inà Telugu)à Robertà Nozick,à Anarchy,à Stateà andà Utopiaà Johnà Gray,à Liberalismà Bernardà Crick,à Socialismà Davidà Held,à Anà Introductionà toà Criticalà Theoryà Rogerà Simon,à Gramsdââ¬â¢sà Politicalà Thought:à Anà Introductionà Emesto Laciau,à Reflectionsà onà theà Revolutionà ofà Ourà Timeà Davidà Muller,à Market,à Sateà andà Communityà G. A. Cohen,â⬠Isà Thereà Stillà aà Caseà forà Socialismâ⬠M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà &à M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATION Semesterà ââ¬âà II (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà &à M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03) Paperà ââ¬â IIà :à Contemporaryà Administrativeà Theory Unit à à I. a)à Eltonà Mayo:à Humanà Relationsà Theoryà b)à Herbertà Aà Simon:à Decisionà Makingà Theoryà a)à Motivationà Theory:à Abrahamà Maslow ââ¬âà Hierarchyà ofà Needsà b)à Frederckà Herzberg:à Motivationà _à Hygieneà Theoryà a)à Douglasà McGregor:à Theoryà ââ¬ËXââ¬â¢Ã andà Theoryà ââ¬ËYââ¬â¢Ã b)à Chrisà Argynis:à Integrationà Betweenà theà individualà andà theà organization. Unit ââ¬âà II. Unità III. Unità IV. a)à Rensisà Likert:à Managementà Systemsà b)à Theoriesà ofà Leadershipà ââ¬â Michiganà Studies,à Chioà Stateà Leadershipà Studies,à Groupà Dynamics,à Managerialà Gridà andà Contingencyà Model. Unit à à V. a)à Policyà Analysis:à Yehzkelà Dror. b)à Newà Publicà Administration:à Minnobrookà Perspective. Readings:à 1. Prasadà Rà andà Othersà (ed)à 2. S. P. Naiduà :à Administrativeà Thinkers(Teluguà /à English)à :à Publicà Administration:à Theoriesà andà Concepts. Newà Ageà Internationalà Publications,à Hyd,1996. 3. Hoshiarà Singhà &à Pradeepà :à Administrativeà Theory,à Kitabà Mahal,à Sachdeva. Newà Delhi,1999. 4. Fredà Luthansà :à Organizationalà Behaviorà 5. Likertà R. ,à :à Newà Patternsà ofà Managementà 6. Argyrisà C. :à Personalityà andà Organizationà 7. Prankà Marinià :à Newà Publicà Administration. à · Studentsà areà requiredà toà consultà relevantà articlesà fromà journalsà relatingà toà publicà administrationà especiallyà theà Indianà Journalà ofà Publicà Administration. M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà &à M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATIONà Semesterà ââ¬âà IIà (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà &à M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03) Paperà ââ¬â IIIà :à Publicà Policyà Unità à à I. a)à Publicà Policy:à Meaning,à Nature,à Scopeà andà Importance. b)à Theà Pioneers:Haroldà D. Lasswellà andà Yehezkelà Dror. Policyà Formulation:à Someà Modelsà a)à Systemsà Modelà b)à Groupà Modelà c)à Eliteà Modelà Theoriesà ofà Decision ââ¬âà Making:à a)à Rationalà Comprehensiveà Theoryà b)à Incrementalà Theoryà c)à Mixed ââ¬âà Scanning Unità à à II. Unità ââ¬âIII. Unità IV. Unità ââ¬âà V. Evaluationà ofà Publicà Policiesà Publicà Policiesà inà India:à a)à Industrialà Policyà b)à Agrarianà Policyà Recommendedà Textà Books:à 1. Anderson,à Jamesà E. :à Publicà Policyà makingà 2. Dye,à Thomasà R:à Underà Standingà Publicà Policyà 3. Yehzakelà Dror:à Venturesà inà Policyà Sciences:à Conceptsà andà Applications. 4. Duttà andà Sundaram:à Indianà Economyà Recommendedà Referenceà Books:à 1. Laswell,Harold. D. :à Policyà Sciences,à Internationalà Encyclopaediaà ofà Socialà Sciences. 2. Dye,à Thomasà R. :à Policyà Analysisà 3. Iraà Sharankasyà (ed. )à :à Policyà Analysisà inà Politicalà Scienceà 4. Charlesà E. Lindblomà :à Theà Policyà makingà processà 5. Danielà Lernorà andà H. D. Lasswellà :à Theà Poplicyà Sciences:à Recentà Developmentà inà Scopeà andà Methodà 6. Dià Nitto,à Dianaà M,à andà Dye,à Thomasà Rà :Socialà Welfare:à Politicsà andà Publicà Policyà 7. Francisà Ankleà :à Indiaââ¬â¢sà Politicalà Economyà 1947à 77:à Theà Gradualà Revolution. 8. Jagà Mohanà (ed. )à :à 25à yearsà ofà Indianà Independenceà 9. M. Kistaiahà :à Publicà Policyà andà Administrationà 10. Srimalà Mohanà Lalà :à Land Reformsà inà Indiaà Promiseà andà performance. 11. Rajaà Purohità A. R. (ed. )à :à Landà Reformsà inà Indiaà 12. Sharma,à B. A. V. (ed. )à :à Politicalà Economyà ofà India:à Aà Studyà ofà Landà Reforms. 13. Vijayà Joshià anà IMDà Littleà :à Indiaââ¬â¢sà Economicà Reformsà 1991à 2001à 14. Drezeà Jeepà andà Amartyà Senà (eds. )à :à Theà Politicalà Economyà ofà Hunger. 15. M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCE &à M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATION. Semesterà ââ¬âà II (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà &à M. A. Publicà Administrationà students withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03) Paperà IV. Researchà Methodology Unità à à I. :Socialà Researchà andà Methodsà 1. Traditional Methodsà 2. Scientificà Methodà 3. Importanceà ofà Socialà Researchà :à Theoryà Formationà 1. Theoryà 2. Factsà andà Valuesà 3. Conceptà Formation Unit ââ¬âà II. Unità III. Hypothesisà andà Researchà Designà 1. formationà ofà Hypothesisà 2. Testingà ofà Hypothesisà 3. Researchà Designà Unit ââ¬âà IV. Collectionà andà Analysisà ofà Dataà andà Reportà Writingà 1. Sampling,à Observation,à Interviewà andà Questionnaireà 2. Analysisà ofà Dataà 3. Reportà Writing Readingà List:à 1. W. J. Goodeà &à P. K. Hatt:à Methodsà ofà Socialà Researchà 2. Wilkinsonà &à Bhandarkar:à Methodologyà andà Techniquesà ofà Socialà Researchà 3. Paulineà Young:à Scientificà Socialà Surveys. M. A. POLITICALà SCIENCEà &à M. A. PUBLICà ADMINISTRATION Semesterà ââ¬âà II (Commonà forà bothà M. A. Politicalà Scienceà & M. A. Publicà Administrationà studentsà withà effectà fromà theà academicà yearà 2002à 03) Paperà III. Indianà Politicalà Process Unità à Ià . :à 1. Indianà Polity:à Theoreticalà Frameworkà 2. Socipà ââ¬âà Politicalà Legaciesà :à Hindu,à Britishà andà Gandhianà :à 1.
Friday, September 27, 2019
The Albatrosses and a Killer Whale Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words
The Albatrosses and a Killer Whale - Essay Example Changes caused to the marine environment due to natural as well as human reasons, as stated by Safina, have made the albatrosses vulnerable (qtd. in Sakamoto et al. 1). As mentioned by Croxall and Brooke, in recent times, studies have been carried out about the diet and foraging habits of these birds. However, little is known about how albatrosses actually locate their prey in the open ocean (qtd. in Sakamoto et al. 1). Previous studies found it difficult to follow individual birds, and thus could not find out all about the foraging activities employed by them. This particular study is mainly aimed at examining how albatrosses find their prey, as well as how they deal with and respond to their environment while on their foraging trips in the Southern Ocean (Sakamoto et al. 1). Four black-browed albatrosses were captured at their nest sites in Bird Island, Southern Georgia for the purpose of this study, and still cameras were attached to their backs. Three of the four birds were recaptured and the instruments retrieved. The fourth bird could not be recaptured. The camera was equipped with depth and temperature sensors. After the recovery of the instruments, the data captured, which included image, depth and temperature, were downloaded to a PC. The environment around the study birds was studied. Other animals or birds which appeared in the images were also scrutinized. Depth data were analyzed with a behavior analysis program.
Thursday, September 26, 2019
Spitfghter mark 1 airplane Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words
Spitfghter mark 1 airplane - Essay Example It continued in these roles until the mid-1950, when production stopped. Until today, the Spitfire continuous to be a favourite aircraft with 53 being airworthy and many more being used as displays in air museums and schools (Zandvoort 1957). The Spitfires design started in 1931 when Mitchell wanted to meet the Air ministryââ¬â¢s new specifications for a modern craft that was capable of 250 mph. The design did not get off to a good start, the first one named Super-marine type 224, had a Rolls-Royce steam-cooled Griffon engine. Accordingly, the engine could only reach a top speed of 230 mph and had bulky gull wings with an open-cockpit. Mitchell and his team were disappointed but not discouraged; they immediately started on their next model designated Type 300. The aircraft went through several modifications, including smaller, thinner and elliptical shaped wings, an enclosed and blister-shaped cockpit, and oxygen-breathing apparatus and a more powerful Rolls-Royce PV-XII V-12 engine. The Air ministry adopted this model and its construction started. The model went into production, as the aircraft was in use over the years the design continuously improved beginning with the Mark I to Mark XIV, until the Spitfire went ou t of production (Axelrod & Kingston 2007). The plane used a semi-elliptical wing, which helped to reduce drag, house a retractable undercarriage while at the same time carried armament and ammunition. The ellipse-shaped and skewed wings ensured that the centre of the pressure aligned with the main spur and which prevented the wings fro twisting. As the aircraft performance Improve and it gained more power, the aileron reversal increased. It meant that there was a need for the design of new wings. The new models helped solve this problem by increasing their stiffness by 47% and the aileron reversals speed improved by the use of geared trim tabs and piano
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)